<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sandboxing on Michael-F-Bryan</title>
    <link>https://adventures.michaelfbryan.com/tags/sandboxing/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Sandboxing on Michael-F-Bryan</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 20:30:29 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://adventures.michaelfbryan.com/tags/sandboxing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>WebAssembly as a Platform for Abstraction</title>
      <link>https://adventures.michaelfbryan.com/posts/wasm-as-a-platform-for-abstraction/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 11:55:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://adventures.michaelfbryan.com/posts/wasm-as-a-platform-for-abstraction/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In a project I&amp;rsquo;ve been playing around with recently, we&amp;rsquo;ve encountered the&#xA;dilemma where you want to make it easy for users to write their own&#xA;application logic using the system but at the same time want to keep that logic&#xA;decoupled from the implementation details of whatever platform the&#xA;application is running on.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;ve been programming for any amount of time your immediate reaction is&#xA;probably &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;why bother mentioning this, doesn&amp;rsquo;t it just fall out of good&#xA;library design?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;, and normally I would totally agree with you, except I&#xA;forgot to mention a couple of important details&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
